Traditional security controls—such as web application firewalls (WAFs) and data loss prevention (DLP) systems—are ill-equipped to defend against a new class of semantic attacks on large language models (LLMs). Threats like prompt injection and context-aware data leakage exploit meaning rather than malicious syntax, rendering conventional tools architecturally blind to these attack vectors.
The Twin Gatekeeper framework addresses this challenge with a real-time architecture tailored for high-stakes environments like finance, healthcare, and government operations. This architecture uses a dual-model vetting process—sometimes informally called an "LLM-as-a-judge"—that pairs a powerful Generator LLM (e.g., Llama 3 70B) with a fast, specialized Checker LLM (e.g., Mistral 7B). The Checker evaluates all inputs and outputs against critical threats like Prompt Injection (LLM-01) and Sensitive Information Disclosure (LLM-06), offering key advantages in resilience and adaptability over simpler rule-based or single-model guardrails. With a verifiable latency overhead of just 100–400 ms, this session includes a demonstration of the framework in action and provides a practical, cost-effective path to deploying scalable, production-ready AI defenses.
Learning Objectives:
Articulate the “semantic gap” that undermines traditional security tools when confronting sophisticated LLM threats like prompt injection and model inversion.
Analyze the Twin Gatekeeper architecture, including its asymmetric Generator–Checker pairing and the dual-model vetting pattern for real-time threat mitigation.
Develop a business case and implementation strategy for an LLM guardrail system, using security-focused benchmarks to select optimal models and compare the dual-model approach against alternatives.